USPTO serial 87726436
FARM FRESH FLASH FROZEN FORK FRIENDLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FARM FRESH FLASH FROZEN FORK FRIENDLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah J. Schneider
Sarah J. Schneider SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY, SUITE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen, prepared vegetable-based entrees; frozen vegetables; frozen, pre-packaged dishes consisting primarily of vegetables, mixed vegetables and vegetables, and mixed vegetables combined with whole grains, or fruit or meat; vegetable-based organic side dishes and vegetable-based organic side dishes also containing processed or whole grains and/or fruit and/or meat and seasoning; steamable food products in a microwaveable bag, namely, organic and non-organic prepared side dishes and meals consisting primarily of seasoned vegetables and mixed vegetables, and seasoned vegetables and mixed vegetables combined with whole grains or fruit and/or meat; frozen vegetable blend; frozen organic and non-organic vegetables and mixed vegetable side dishes; prepared entrees consisting primarily of organic vegetables together with whole grains or pasta, and/or sauce and seasoning; organic and non-organic side dishes and meals consisting primarily of organic vegetables together with whole grains or pasta, and/or sauce and seasoning; organic and non-organic packaged food combinations consisting primarily of processed vegetables, processed vegetables and combined with whole grains, processed vegetables and meat, and/or processed vegetables and processed fruit | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared entrees consisting primarily of whole grains or pasta together with seasoned vegetables, mixed vegetables, fruit and/or meat; processed, frozen, cooked or packaged whole grains; organic and non-organic whole grain-based entrees and side dishes also containing vegetables and/or meat and/or fruit and seasoning; frozen foods, namely, organic and non-organic grain based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres and side dishes; processed grains; steamable food products in a microwaveable bag, namely, prepared organic and non-organic side dishes and meals consisting of whole grains with seasoned vegetables, mixed vegetables, fruit and/or meat | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tommy's Superfoods, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tommy's Superfoods, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FARM FRESH FLASH FROZEN FORK FRIENDLY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |