USPTO serial 87727557
Serial No. 87727557
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ANDREW T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 87727557?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Crystallized fruits; Fish croquettes; Fish mousses; Fish preserves; Fish sausages; Fish steak; Fruit jellies; Meat; Oils for food; Potato flakes; Prepared nuts; Soya milk; Tinned fruits; Vegetables, cooked; Meat, fish, fruit and vegetable jellies; Preserved fish; Salted fish; Tinned fish | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Biscuits; Bread; Cakes; Candy; Cereal-based snack food; Coffee; Condiment, namely, oyster sauce; Condiment, namely, pepper sauce; Edible ices; Meat pies; Propolis for human consumption; Propolis for food purposes; Tea; Chili oil for use as a seasoning or condiment; Cocoa-based condiments and seasonings for food and drink; Food condiment consisting primarily of ketchup and salsa; Seaweed for use as a condiment; Soya bean paste | ABANDONED | Feb 20, 2016 |
| 032 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Aerated water; Beer; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavoured with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; Non-alcoholic rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks; Protein-enriched sports beverages; Soft drinks; Soya-based beverages, other than milk substitutes; Vegetable juices; Water beverages; Whey beverages; Drinking waters; Mineral waters; Soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; Table waters | ABANDONED | Feb 20, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fujian Panpan Foodstuff Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by JINJIANG FUYUAN FOODSTUFF CO., LTD. FUJIAN
- Other trademarks owned by JINJIANG FUYUAN FOODSTUFF CO., LTD. FUJIAN
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 11, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 11, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |