USPTO serial 87729251
SAPIEN LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAPIEN LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington, VA
Arlington, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.222 East 68th StreetNew York, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for large scale aggregation and analysis of human brain data as well as applications for neurodiagnostics, wearable brain health tracking and tracking of brain health, cognition, emotion and behavior with or without electronic sensors; electronic sensors, not for medical purposes, for monitoring, recording, and tracking physiology, including brain activity; computer software for controlling electronic devices for use in neuromodulation and in monitoring, recording, and tracking brain activity; A kit, for personal use, consisting of a head worn device for measuring, tracking, and monitoring electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG), electro-oculogram (EOG), and/or electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, and/or accelerometer and/or gyroscope data, and associated software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Analytical services, namely, analyzing data for scientific purposes obtained using apparatus for human brain monitoring such as electroencephalography (EEG), functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and other related techniques; consultancy relating to technical and scientific analysis in the field of human brain activity related to electroencephalography (EEG) and other human brain monitoring technologies; consultancy relating to technical and scientific measuring of electroencephalography (EEG), functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and other human brain monitoring technologies; consultancy relating to research and development in the field of brain health testing, diagnostics and therapeutics; chemical, medical and biological research and laboratory services for scientific purposes; scientific and technological services, namely set up, design and implementation of research studies and clinical testing including analysis of data and presentation of outcomes; research and development relating in the field of human brain monitoring and brain health including electroencephalography (EEG); scientific experiments, namely, in the field of neuro- and bio-feedback; engineering, repairing and maintenance of software; design and development of medical technology; design and development of scientific testing and analysis methods; design of diagnostic apparatus and equipment, namely, in the field of neuro- and bio-feedback; research, development, analysis and consultancy services in the field of engineering, namely, in the field of neuro- and bio-feedback; research, development, analysis and consultancy services in the field of engineering, information technology, medicine, ecology and environment; research, development, analysis and consultancy in the field of physics, chemistry and biology; scientific research, development, testing, analysis and consultancy; research, development, analysis and consultancy in the field of measuring and control technology; research, development, analysis and consultancy in the field of engineering; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the above-mentioned analytical services, namely, for use in collection, management of research and clinical data, for use in scientific collaboration, for sharing and analysis of data and for presentation and dissemination of scientific results | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 20, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |