Drawing for BELIEVE BY MICHELLE WILLIAMS

USPTO serial 87731067

BELIEVE BY MICHELLE WILLIAMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BELIEVE BY MICHELLE WILLIAMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Konrad Gatien

Konrad Gatien KEATS GATIEN, LLP120 S. EL CAMINO DRIVE, SUITE 207BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Silverware, namely, forks, knives and spoons that are made of silver or silver-plated; cutlery, namely, forks, knives and spoonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 18, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 10, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 8, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 16, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 12, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance