USPTO serial 87732523
LATINO FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LATINO FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Union City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben D Manevitz
Ben D Manevitz MANEVITZ LAW FIRM LLC301 Route 17 North, Suite 800Rutherford, NJ 07070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pepper paste; Processed beans; Processed chia seeds; Processed garlic; Processed potatoes; Processed edible seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings; Processed fava beans; Processed garbanzo beans; Sweet corn, processed; Sweet corn-based snack foods; Vegetables, dried; Vegetables, preserved; Canned beans; Cooked beans; Dried beans; Dried vegetables; Frozen seafood; Frozen shellfish; Frozen sweet corn; Frozen vegetables; Preserved chilli peppers; Preserved vegetables; Preserved chopped chilli peppers, not being seasonings or flavorings; Processed sweet corn; Processed vegetables | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2016 |
| 030 | Corn, milled; Corn, roasted; Cornflour; Cornmeal; Empanada dough; Grain-based food bars; Grain-based snack foods; Grits; Herb tea; Herbal tea; Husked barley; Maize meal; Milled flax seeds; Multigrain-based snack foods; Pastries; Pastry; Pastry dough; Pearl barley; Pearled barley; Pepper paste for use as a seasoning; Processed corn; Processed garlic for use as seasoning; Processed seeds for use as a seasoning; Roasted corn; Seasoning pastes; Seasoning mixes; Seasonings; Tortilla shells; Tortillas; Bean flour; Chili seasoning; Chili paste for use as a seasoning; Corn flour; Dried chili peppers; Food seasonings; Garlic paste for use as a seasoning; Hominy; Hominy grits; Maize flour; Nut flours; Processed quinoa; Taco seasoning; Toasted corn kernels; Wheat flour | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |