Drawing for AECOSIM

USPTO serial 87732657

AECOSIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AECOSIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Blanchette

JAMES A. BLANCHETTE Cesari and McKenna LLPOne Liberty SquareBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer aided design (CAD) software for interdisciplinary design and analysis; downloadable computer software for designing, analyzing, documenting, modeling and visualizing buildings facilities, plants and structures; downloadable computer software for designing, analyzing, documenting and modeling mechanical systems, environmental conditions, and energy performanceABANDONEDMay 8, 2012
042Software as a service (SAAS) and cloud computing software for interdisciplinary design and analysis; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for designing, analyzing, documenting, modeling and visualizing buildings facilities, plants and structures; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for designing, analyzing, documenting and modeling mechanical systems; consulting services in the nature of the implementation of custom software for design of buildings, facilities, plants and structures; consulting services in the nature of the implementation of custom software for designing, analyzing, documenting and modeling mechanical systems, environmental conditions, and energy performanceABANDONEDMay 8, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2019MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2019ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance