USPTO serial 87734664
SKYDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EUBANK, REBECCA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKYDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Toyota-shi, Aichi-ken, JP
TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Toyota-shi, Aichi-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher I. Donahue
CHRISTOPHER I DONAHUE OBLON MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT LLP1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | gliders and structural parts therefor; hot air balloons; parachutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2020 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |