USPTO serial 87734788
XIJIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, LAURA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XIJIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GuangZhou, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Apparatus for tattooing; Beard clippers; Beard trimmers; Blades and brushes for electric hair clippers and trimmers; Branding irons; Butter curlers; Cuticle pushers; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Depilatory appliances; Ear piercing apparatus; Ear piercing guns; Ear piercing needles; Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; Electric beard trimmers; Electric ear hair trimmers; Electric fingernail polishers; Electric flat irons; Electric hair clippers; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair curling irons; Electric hair cutters; Electric hair straightener; Electric hair straightening irons; Electric hair trimmers; Electric hand-held hair styling irons; Electric irons; Electric irons for styling hair; Electric manicure sets; Electric nail clippers; Electric nail files; Electric nasal hair trimmers; Electric pedicure sets; Electric razors; Electric razors and electric hair clippers; Electric shavers; Electrolysis apparatus for hair removal; Epilatory appliances; Eyelash curlers; Eyelash separators; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Flat irons, electric; Foot care implements, namely, foot files; Foot care implements, namely, foot scrapers; Glazing irons; Goffering irons; Hair clippers; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Hair clippers for Adult,Child; Hair trimmers; Hoes; Manicure implements, namely, orange sticks; Manicure sets; Manicure sets, electric; Nail buffers, electric or non-electric; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files, electric; Nail skin treatment trimmers; Non-electric curling irons; Non-electric fingernail polishers; Pedicure sets; Pruning scissors; Razor cases; Razors; Razors, electric or non-electric; Scissors adapted to receive attachment guide combs for hair cutting and trimming; Shaving blades; Tattoo machine parts, namely, springs and armature bars; Tattoo machines | ACTIVE | Nov 10, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |