USPTO serial 87735643
BANUK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2022
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BANUK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $325
Owner
Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, casual clothing, and outdoor clothing, namely, shirts, tops as clothing, pants, shorts, rain jackets, puffer jackets, vests, parkas; footwear, namely, athletic footwear, casual footwear, outdoor winter footwear, rubbers being footwear, namely, rain footwear, rubber boots and rubber shoes, fishing footwear, namely, rubber fishing boots, fishing waders, sports footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BANUK
- Prosecution event R.PR explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2021 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2021 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |