Drawing for Serial No. 87735798

USPTO serial 87735798

Serial No. 87735798

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87735798?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lindsay Cohen Schneider

Lindsay Cohen Schneider Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP211 NORTH BROADWAY, SUITE 3600ST. LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of educational materials in the nature of a digital mobile application for others in the fields of nutrition, food, and solutions to the problem of hungerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 11, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 3, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 3, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 3, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 7, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 5, 2019ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 24, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 12, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 12, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance