USPTO serial 87735869
CHANDLER TOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANDER, DREW M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHANDLER TOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Caraco
Thomas Caraco Trademark Angel Inc.269 Walker St. PMB 755Detroit, MI 48207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Gas-operated soldering irons; Hot melt glue guns; Power tool parts, namely, collets; Power tools, namely, burrs; Power tools, namely, hammer drills; Power tools, namely, hammer drivers; Power tools, namely, silicone pistols; Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, drilling tools; Power-operated tools, namely, drill hammers; Power-operated tools, namely, grinders; Soldering irons, electric; Machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tool, namely, rigid and rod hand benders for use on pipes and conduits; Hand tools for repair and maintenance of bicycles; Hand tools, namely, hand benders for use on pipes and conduits; Hand tools, namely, bar cutters; Hand tools, namely, bolt cutters; Hand tools, namely, clamps; Hand tools, namely, crimp wrench sets; Hand tools, namely, crimp wrenches; Hand tools, namely, files; Hand tools, namely, gouges; Hand tools, namely, hammers; Hand tools, namely, hatchets; Hand tools, namely, hex keys wrenches; Hand tools, namely, knife sharpeners; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grindstones; Hand tools, namely, nippers; Hand tools, namely, nut drivers; Hand tools, namely, pliers sets; Hand tools, namely, rasps; Hand tools, namely, ratchet wrenches; Hand tools, namely, riveters; Hand tools, namely, saws; Hand tools, namely, scrapers; Hand tools, namely, screw extractors; Hand tools, namely, screwdrivers; Hand tools, namely, socket sets; Hand tools, namely, socket wrenches; Hand tools, namely, tap and die sets; Hand tools, namely, taps; Hand tools, namely, vices; Hand tools, namely, wire cutters; Hand tools, namely, wire nippers; Hand tools, namely, wire strippers; Hand tools, namely, wrenches; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand-operated automotive repair tools, namely, magnetic pick-up tools; Hand-operated locking clamp tools; Hand-operated sharpening tools and instruments; Knives; Miter vises being hand tools; Socket wrenches; Wire strippers; Wrenches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |