Drawing for BONITO

USPTO serial 87737308

BONITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT A. RIVAS

ROBERT A. RIVAS ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY, PC445 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3000LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Food and beverage services in the nature of restaurant services, bar services, cantina services, cafe servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 19, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 30, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2019PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Sep 20, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 23, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 17, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance