Drawing for BUBBA KUSH

USPTO serial 87738232

BUBBA KUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUBBA KUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Gross

MICHELLE L GROSS MICHELLE L GROSS PC9304 E RAINTREE DRSUITE 120SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Board gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2020ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 19, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 13, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 13, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 13, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 8, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 8, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 12, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance