USPTO serial 87741290
FDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shiyong Ye
250 W 34th StreetOne Penn Plaza, Suite 2015New York, NY 10119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Bicycle locks; Buckles of common metal; Buildings, transportable, of metal; Casement windows of metal; Cashboxes of metal; Clips of metal for cables and pipes; Common metals and their alloys including stainless steel; Common metals and their alloys, unwrought or semi-wrought; Common metals, unwrought or semi-wrought; Containers of metal for transport; Door bells of metal, non-electric; Fittings of metal for furniture; Foils of metal for wrapping and packaging; Frames of metal for building; Metal building materials, namely, soffits; Metal containers for the storage and transportation of goods; Metal hardware for use in descending ropes, namely, belay devices; Metal hardware for use in descending ropes, namely, descenders; Metal hardware, namely, carabiners of metal; Metal hardware, namely, double-end swivels; Metal hardware, namely, karabiners of metal; Metal hardware, namely, pulleys; Metal hardware, namely, nuts; Metal hardware, namely, springs; Metal hardware, namely, washers; Metal manhole covers; Metal valves not being parts of machines; Metal window frames; Metal gratings; Metal gutters; Metal ores; Metal railings; Metal safes; Metallic materials for railway tracks; Non-electrical cables and wires of common metal; Portable metal buildings; Safe deposit boxes; Signboards of metal; Solar panel mounts made of metal; Solder wire; Soldering wire of metal; Substrates primarily of metal for supporting solar cells, photovoltaic cells and solar collectors; Tool and tool accessory trays made of metal sold empty and parts and fittings therefor; Underdrainage pipes of metal; Windows of metal; Works of art of common metal; Anchors | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2020 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 23, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |