USPTO serial 87743287
MAGNOLIA PARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ, SAMANTHA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNOLIA PARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Beitchman
David P. Beitchman BEITCHMAN & ZEKIAN, P.C.16130 VENTURA BLVD., STE. 570ENCINO, CA 91432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Operating an on-line shopping site in the field of Bridesmaid dresses, Dress suits, Dresses, Dressing gowns, Evening dresses, Skirts and dresses, Wedding dresses, Women's ceremonial dresses, Blouses, Belts, Hats, Skirts, Shirts, Short-sleeved shirts, Tee shirts, Pants, Scarves, Shawls, Shoes, Slips, Gloves, Fur stoles, Stoles, Jackets, Coats, Capelets, Headbands, Tunics, Vests, Corsets, Bathing suits; Retail stores featuring clothing and accessories, namely, Bridesmaid dresses, Dress suits, Dresses, Dressing gowns, Evening dresses, Skirts and dresses, Wedding dresses, Women's ceremonial dresses, Blouses, Belts, Hats, Skirts, Shirts, Short-sleeved shirts, Tee shirts, Pants, Scarves, Shawls, Shoes, Slips, Gloves, Fur stoles, Stoles, Jackets, Coats, Capelets, Headbands, Tunics, Vests, Corsets, Bathing suits; On-line retail store services featuring clothing and accessories, namely, Bridesmaid dresses, Dress suits, Dresses, Dressing gowns, Evening dresses, Skirts and dresses, Wedding dresses, Women's ceremonial dresses, Blouses, Belts, Hats, Skirts, Shirts, Short-sleeved shirts, Tee shirts, Pants, Scarves, Shawls, Shoes, Slips, Gloves, Fur stoles, Stoles, Jackets, Coats, Capelets, Headbands, Tunics, Vests, Corsets, Bathing suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |