Drawing for TALOS

USPTO serial 87744716

TALOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLOWAY, CHRISTINA DENISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TALOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda K. Greenspon

AMANDA K. GREENSPON MUNCK WILSON MANDALA LLPP.O. DRAWER 800889DOCKET CLERKDALLAS, TX 75380

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cash handling systems comprised of cash registers, cash dispensers, banknote validators, banknote dispensers, banknote acceptors for separating authentic banknotes and notes from counterfeits, computer software and computer hardware ; cash authentication systems comprised of cash registers, cash dispensers, banknote validators, banknote dispensers, banknote acceptors for separating authentic banknotes and notes from counterfeits, computer software and computer hardware; cash management software; cash security systems comprised of cash registers, cash dispensers, banknote validators, banknote dispensers, banknote acceptors for separating authentic banknotes and notes from counterfeits, computer software and computer hardware; banknote counting apparatus; payment and money processing and handling systems comprised of cash registers, cash dispensers, computer software and computer hardware and equipment, namely, banknote validators, banknote dispensers, banknote acceptors for separating authentic banknotes and notes from counterfeits; Banknote mechanism that validates, denominates, accepts, stores and dispenses banknotes; banknote sorting machines; banknote selector machines; computer hardware and software for remotely collecting electronic data, namely, data from currency counters, currency sorters, currency validators, vending machines, unattended payment systems, slot machines, casino gaming machines, bill and banknote operated machines and change-making machines, banknote mechanism that validates, denominates, accepts, stores and dispenses banknotesACTIVEMay 15, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 24, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 19, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 19, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 8, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance