Drawing for APOLLO NEUROSCIENCE

USPTO serial 87745080

APOLLO NEUROSCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with APOLLO NEUROSCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey T. Morris

Jeffrey T. Morris Elliott & Davis PC6425 Living PlaceSuite 200Pittsburgh, PA 15206

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscience; Computer software and hardware for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscience; Computer software for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscience and instructional user guides sold as a unit; Computer software for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscience that may be downloaded from a global computer network; Computer software for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscience that may be uploaded to or downloaded from a global network; Computer software platforms, downloadable, for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscience; Computer software platforms, recorded, for utilization of sound waves to facilitate nervous system balance and regulation of mood, arousal, and cognition in the field of neuroscienceACTIVEJul 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2020MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Sep 9, 2020ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Feb 27, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 27, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2020PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 10, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2019CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 7, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 25, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 24, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance