USPTO serial 87745544
MITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel A. Rice
RACHEL A. RICE POLSINELLI PC1401 LAWRENCE STREETSUITE 2300DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Soups; Fried chicken; Tempura vegetables; Tempura seafood; Poke bowls, namely, prepared entrees consisting primarily of fish and vegetables; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, seafood, chicken or vegetables and also containing rice or pasta noodles; Thai food dishes being prepared meals consisting primarily of chicken or, shrimp or beef or pork or vegetables and also containing pasta noodles or rice; (Based on 44(e))(Based on Intent to Use) Sesame oil for food; Seaweed salad; Processed sesame seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on Intent to Use) Spring rolls; Peanut sauce; Flour-based dumplings; Rice; Oyster sauce; Sandwiches; Fish sauce; Edible soy sheets being used as wraps; Tempura flour; Prepared wasabi, namely, wasabi paste, grated wasabi, wasabi mustard, powdered wasabi; Vermicelli; Spicy mayonnaise; Prepared meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta noodles and also containing vegetables, meat, chicken, and seafood; Thai food dishes being prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta noodles or rice and also containing chicken or, shrimp or beef or pork or vegetables; (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Sushi; Teriyaki sauce; Imperial rolls; Soy sauce; Rice vinegar; Sushi sauce; Nuoc mam sauce; Sesame seeds for use as seasonings; Mirin sauce; Tamari sauce; Edible rice paper; Sheets of edible seaweed; Panko breadcrumbs; Chow mein noodles; Ginger | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Retail store services featuring carry out foods and beverages; Retail store services featuring Japanese food dishes for consumption; Retail store services featuring sushi; Remote food ordering services, namely, computerized online ordering services in the field of food; retail store services and food services featuring Asian food products; retail store services featuring food products; Wholesale retail store services featuring food products; (Based on 44(e))(Based on Intent to Use) Retail store services and food services featuring Thai food; Retail store services featuring sushi | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | (Based on Intent to Use) Sushi delivery services; Distribution services, namely, delivery of food products for making sushi | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | (Based on Intent to Use) Preparation of sushi; Preparation of food products for making sushi; Preparation of carry out foods and beverages; Preparation of Japanese food dishes for consumption; Take-out restaurant services for Asian food dishes; Fast food restaurant services: Mobile restaurant services; (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Food catering; Preparation of Thai food; Preparation of food products for making sushi | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 9138-1616 QUEBEC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 9138-1616 QUEBEC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MITO GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MITO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |