Drawing for XAVIER

USPTO serial 87745649

XAVIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XAVIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Jansen, Esq.

Mark A. Jansen, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetMountain View, CA 94041UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic computing platform for operating self-driving and autonomous land vehicles; self-driving and autonomous land vehicle electronic driving system and equipment in the nature of artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning and high performance computing software and hardware for vehicles; artificial intelligence computers; supercomputers; artificial intelligence supercomputers; graphics processing units (GPUs); graphics processing units (GPUs) in the nature of computer hardware for enhancing graphical and video display; semiconductors and semiconductor chip sets; system-on-chip (SOC) processors; electronic computer vision accelerators for use with artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and high performance computing hardware and software, vehicles, autonomous machines, robots, drones, medical instruments, and intelligent video analytics; computer software for performing computer graphics operations and improving graphical and video display capabilities; computer graphics software for improving display quality; computer graphics software for enhancement of graphical and video display; computer graphics firmware for enhancement of graphical and video display; computer software for the display of digital media; computer software, and communications hardware and software for the operation, control, maintenance, and management of land vehicles, self-driving and autonomous land vehicles and land vehicle components, for land vehicle navigation, for travel and trip planning, for communications and for collecting, tracking, analyzing, and reporting data and information in the field of self-driving and autonomous land vehicles; electronic control systems for land motor vehicles; electronic display interfaces; electronic display interfacesACTIVE—
042Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for operation, control, maintenance, management and communication of vehicles in the field of self-driving and autonomous land vehicle and self-driving and autonomous land vehicle components; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for vehicles in the field of operating electronic control systems for land motor vehicles; providing on-line nondownloadable software for the operation, control, maintenance, and management of land vehicles, self-driving and autonomous land vehicles and land vehicle components, for land vehicle navigation, for travel and trip planning, for communications and for collecting, tracking, analyzing, and reporting data and information in the field of self-driving and autonomous land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2021EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2021EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 25, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 24, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 22, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 23, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance