USPTO serial 87746732
EVIDENCE LAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVIDENCE LAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk M. Miles, Registration No. 37,891
KIRK M. MILES, REGISTRATION NO. 37,891 THE WEBB LAW FIRMONE GATEWAY CENTER420 FORT DUQUESNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Information, advice and consultancy relating to the monitoring and detection of financial transactions for fraud and money laundering; detecting and preventing suspicious financial behavior and reducing monetary losses; information, advice and consultancy relating to financial risk management; advice and consultancy on financial transactions and behavior that can be identified for filing as evidence of financial crimes to regulatory authorities | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2018 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, operating and managing dynamic computer networks and electronic data storage for others to monitor and detect financial fraud; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for ingesting, normalizing, analyzing, and evaluating financial transactions and behaviour using advanced risk scoring and model validation, monitoring electronic data and multi-payment channels including online, mobile and internet-of-things type of devices for correlation and analytics of fraud and money laundering events of interest such as user identity virtual recognition using risk-based multi-factor authentication, device finger printing, facial recognition combined with behavioral risk scoring of payment activities and tasks, normalizing of fraud and money laundering events of interest for advanced risk scoring and alerts, and recording of fraud and money laundering events of interest and filing or submission of recorded events of interest with or to regulatory authorities; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for analyzing and evaluating financial data for advanced risk scoring and model validation, monitoring electronic data and online financial transactions for correlation and analytics of current events, analysis of customer identity using log-in credentials, facial recognition, and other fraud detection methods, customer relationship management, monitoring and analysis of suspicious financial transactions, performing computer network benchmarking to create a baseline of normal financial activity, detecting anomalous or suspicious financial activity, investigating linked webpage relationships and activities by evaluating and analyzing weblinks, source code, and geographic data, and generating and transmitting electronic and written reports and electronic filings to regulatory authorities; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for machine learning (ML) computer systems that improve performance by utilizing pattern recognition and computational theory to construct algorithms that can improve performance and make predictions for use in financial and identity fraud monitoring and detection; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for segmenting customers to determine threshold parameters of behavioral data obtained from these segments to use in future machine learning (ML) computer systems for use in financial and identify monitoring and detection; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for determining and setting threshold parameters for financial and identify fraud risk scoring machine learning (ML) computer systems; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services using advanced machine learning algorithms for determining effective threshold values of behavioral data to use in any given scenario for successful detection of high risk events including financial and identity fraud; Testing the performance of online computer software that uses machine learning models prior to going live with a dry run of an alert-generation cycle in a test environment; Maintaining and updating of online computer software that uses machine learning models on a periodic basis to generate and investigate alerts below financial and identity fraud risk scoring thresholds; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for providing risk assessment for any event-of-interest including detection and scoring of financial and identify fraud risk by advanced cloud services driven artificial intelligence, machine learning and behavioural analytics; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for multi-channel payment fraud detection and assignment of risk scores for financial transactions including automated clearing house purchases, wiring services, online purchases, and mobile purchases; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for supplier portal fraud detection and analytics, namely, for protecting data and information from unauthorized access; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for money laundering detection, evaluating financial risk, assigning a credit rating to customers, assigning a risk rating to financial transactions, evaluating financial transactions for potential government or financial institution sanctions, reviewing government criminal watchlists, evaluating the impact of negative news from financial transactions and institutions, generating currency transaction report filings and suspicious activity report filings, analyzing web links and source code for irregularities, managing financial data and risk alerts and for storing, managing, and editing electronic data, including electronic documents and computer media and image files; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services for real-time financial and identity risk assessment and scoring of anomalies of subscriber registered events-of-interest; Flexible public, managed on-premise, or managed hybrid cloud computing services featuring software for enabling the collection, analysis, processing, preservation, and reporting of events-of-interest in the form of electronic evidence of financial and identity fraud risk | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guardian Analytics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Guardian Analytics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EVIDENCE LAKE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |