Drawing for Serial No. 87748810

USPTO serial 87748810

Serial No. 87748810

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87748810?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey J. Banyas

JEFFREY J BANYAS EDWIN A SISSON ATTORNEY AT LAW LLC303 NORTH COURT STREETPO BOX 867MEDINA, OH 44258

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Mirror housings for vehiclesACTIVEOct 31, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 13, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 22, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 22, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 22, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance