Drawing for M-FILES 365

USPTO serial 87750532

M-FILES 365

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M-FILES 365?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Holman

JOHN C. HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST., NW, STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for document management, knowledge management, data management, content management, information management, and project management; computer software for database management for use in data transformation, delivery, and classificationACTIVE—
035Data and business information management in the nature of information and data compilation and analysis relating to business management; enterprise content management database services in the field of data transformation, delivery, and classification, namely, providing a secured access database via the internet through which documents and images can be viewed, copied, and printed for purposes of conducting corporate transactionsACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing telecommunications access to databases; computer-aided transmission of messages and imagesACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing of training relating to computer programs for document management, knowledge management, data management, content management, information management, and project managementACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer software, namely, design and development of computer software for document management, knowledge management, data management, content management, information management and project management; computer system design services in the field of data transformation, delivery, and classification; consultation services relating to computers; technical support services relating to computer networks, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems relating to computer programs for document management, knowledge management, data management, content management, information management, project management and work group systems, data transformation, data delivery, and data classificationACTIVE—
045Legal services, namely, licensing of computer software for document management, knowledge management, data management, content management, information management, and project management, data transformation, data delivery, and data classificationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 26, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 26, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 19, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2018AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance