USPTO serial 87750644
JACK HORNER'S WORLD OF DINOSAURS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANFIELD III, JOSEPH J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JACK HORNER'S WORLD OF DINOSAURS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bainbridge Island, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Schnider
David Schnider Nolan Heimann LLP16133 Ventura Blvd.Suite 820Encino, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; Computer software for providing science information; Computer software for allowing users to simulate the work of a paleontologist; Motion picture films about paleontology; Downloadable films and television programs featuring science information provided via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | Dec 29, 2017 |
| 018 | Sports type of backpacks for children or adults which would carry the Mark and could be used for any outdoor activity representing adventure and science discovery in the natural world, including digging for dinosaurs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | men, women, and children: pullover and buttoned shirts, tee-shirts, light-weight casual jackets, heavy-weight casual jackets, sweatshirts (hooded and un-hooded), rain ponchos, rain jackets, caps, hats, socks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | children: dinosaur toys, games, and puzzles which would all involve in some ways discovering what dinosaurs physically looked like, how they moved, how they behaved, and how they sounded. Plush dinosaurs (soft toys) for children which are scientifically specified by Jack Horner according to latest theories | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Museum consultation services in the field of museums; Organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; Consulting services in relation to the organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; Educational services, namely, providing displays and exhibits in the field of science; Consulting services in relation to the provision of educational displays and exhibits in the field of science; Zoo consultation services; Film production; Production of television programs; Entertainment services in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of science; Online journals, namely, blogs featuring science information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design consultation services in the field of theme parks and museums; Design, development, and consulting services reltated thereto in the field of dinosaur exhibits; Consultation in the design of dinosaur exhibits for entertainment, scientific and educational industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services for engaging children and families in dinosaur science; online DinoClub for members to communicate about dinosaurs and science | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Horner Science Group LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named JACK HORNER'S WORLD OF DINOSAURS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |