Drawing for INFORMATION BUILDERS

USPTO serial 87753964

INFORMATION BUILDERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFORMATION BUILDERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD F MANDELBAUM

HOWARD F MANDELBAUM MANDELBAUM SILFIN ECONOMOU LLP222 BLOOMINGDALE ROAD SUITE 120WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for distributing and managing information from databases, and for building decision support and business intelligence applicationsACTIVE—
042computer system design services for building information systems with data access and database management, and knowledge-based systems in a wide variety of fieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 18, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 8, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 7, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 7, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2020CTDDCT DECISION: DISMISSED—
Apr 30, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 4, 2019RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 7, 2019GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2019GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2019CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 7, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 7, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 8, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2018LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 27, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance