Drawing for ATLANTA

USPTO serial 87754034

ATLANTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATLANTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Lantz

JENNIFER M. LANTZ HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 700DALLAS, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely, video processors and digital signal processors; digital video interface television transmitters and receivers; high-definition television transmitters and receivers; digital television transmitters and receivers; liquid crystal display television transmitters and receivers; digital transmitters, audio-video receivers, transceivers, digital video graphics controllers, electrical digital video controllers; electrical LCD panel controllers; electrical display controllers; electrical monitor controllers; digital video processors; integrated circuits, integrated circuit transmitters and integrated circuit receivers; semiconductors; audio video processors, namely, port processors, format converters, scalers, and switches; embedded system computer hardware; consumer electronics components, namely, semiconductors; computer software, namely, software, firmware, embedded software, and utility programs for management, transmission and receipt of digital data; computer software, firmware, embedded software, and utility programs for use as an interface between audio/video sources and audio/video monitorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2018TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Feb 16, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance