Drawing for SIMPLIFY, AUTOMATE, MODERNIZE SERVICE MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 87762429

SIMPLIFY, AUTOMATE, MODERNIZE SERVICE MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLIFY, AUTOMATE, MODERNIZE SERVICE MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick Schweihs

PATRICK SCHWEIHS Copymark Law Group, LLC543 Brier StKenilworth, IL 60043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and computer programs for the management of information technology and business systems; computer software and computer programs to integrate computer operating support systemsACTIVE
042Creation, design, and development of computer software, computer programs and computer systems, namely, multi-vendor information technology management systems; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for developing, deploying, operating, monitoring, configuring, customizing, implementing, analyzing, and managing of network and service operations and performance by multiple users on a single technology platform; Design, installation, updating and maintenance of application software for end to end service assurance; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site management services of the computer networks of others for network and service operations monitoring and management; Providing service assurance in the field of technology integration services for the purpose of ensuring the quality of services offeredACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance