Drawing for MASTERCHEF

USPTO serial 87762705

MASTERCHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5891976Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 22, 2019
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with MASTERCHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 E 42ND ST, Suite 1250New York, NY 10165United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035online retail store services in relation to cookware, pots and pans, tableware, crockery, and spoons, chef knives, kitchen knives, kitchen utensils, services being dishes; provision of an online market place for buyers [ and sellers ] of goods [ and services; and online trading services in which users negotiate transactions via the Internet in relation to cookware, machines and machine tools for home use and domestic kitchen purposes, pots and pans, tableware, crockery, cutlery, knives, forks and spoons, chef knives, kitchen knives, devices for cooking, heating and baking, barbecues, cooking apparatus, kitchen utensils, services being dishes ]ACTIVEAug 16, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 11, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2025NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Sep 4, 2025E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2019SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 8, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 17, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 23, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 23, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance