USPTO serial 87763613
MCLOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAYCEDO, CATHERINE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCLOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Brinza
DANIEL BRINZA DANIEL BRINZA LAW OFFICE1155 NORTH SERVICE ROAD WEST, UNIT 11OAKVILLE, ONTARIO, L6M3E3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Dating agency services; Dating services; Dating services provided via website and mobile apps; Dating services, namely, providing an on-line computer database featuring single people interested in meeting other single people; Computer dating services; Internet based social networking, introduction, and dating services; Internet-based dating, social introduction and social networking services; Marriage partner introduction or dating services; Video dating services; Web site services featuring on-line dating club | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |