USPTO serial 87764110
FAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven W. Klutkowski
STEVEN W. KLUTKOWSKI DUKE HOLZMAN PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP701 SENECA STREETSUITE 750BUFFALO, NY 14210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Coconut oil for food; Edible oil, namely, coconut; Fruit chips; Processed coconut; Vegetable chips (Based on Intent to Use) Coconut milk; Coconut milk for culinary purposes; Coconut milk powder; Coconut milk-based beverages; Milk; Milk based beverages containing fruit juice; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk beverages, milk predominating; Milk drinks containing fruits; Milk substitutes; Beverages made from milk; Flavoured milk; Lactose-free milk; Organic milk | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2016 |
| 030 | Coconut extracts for use as a food flavoring | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2016 |
| 032 | Coconut water; Coconut juice; Water beverages; Aerated water; Aerated water; Bottled water; Bottled artesian water; Bottled drinking water; Carbonated waters; Distilled drinking water; Drinking water; Drinking water with vitamins; Drinking waters; Flavored waters; Flavored bottled water; Flavored enhanced water; Flavoured waters; Mineral and aerated water; Mineral and aerated waters; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages also containing coconut; Powders used in the preparation of coconut water beverages; Purified bottled drinking water; Seltzer water; Soda water; Sparkling water; Still water; Still waters; Table water; Table waters; Tonic water | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |