USPTO serial 87767575
KITCHNWARES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PODESTA, GIDETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITCHNWARES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Steinmetz
MICHAEL STEINMETZ GARSON, SEGAL, STEINMETZ, FLADGATE LLP164 W 25TH ST FL 11RNEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Butcher knives; Can openers, non-electric; Carving knives; Ceramic knives; Chef knives; Filleting knives; Fruit knives; Hand tools, namely, knife sharpeners; Household knives; Kitchen knives; Knife sharpeners; Meat tenderizer, namely, a kitchen mallet; Non-electric can openers; Paring knives; Serving knives; Spatulas being hand tools; Spoons; Stainless steel table knives, forks and spoons; Table knives; Tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Thin-bladed kitchen knives; Cutlery, namely, forks, spoons, and knives; Knives, forks and spoons; Plastic cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Baking dishes; Baking mats; Basting brushes; Bottle openers; Bottle openers, electric and non-electric; Brushes for basting meat; Cleaning brushes for barbecue grills; Fly swatters; Household utensils, namely, graters; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Household utensils, namely, turners; Household utensils, namely, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks; Ice cube trays; Knife blocks; Knife boards; Knife rests; Ladles, for kitchen use; Rotating holders for kitchen utensils; Silicone baking cups; Silicone cupcake baking liners; Silicone muffin baking liners; Utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; Vegetable mashers; Wine openers; Wood chopping blocks; Cheese board and knife set | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |