Drawing for UNFOLD

USPTO serial 87767872

UNFOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNFOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Mancino Marsh, Esq.

Michelle Mancino Marsh, Esq. Arent Fox LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for playing card games, games of skill, poker, poker games, casino games, gambling, betting and poker tournaments, competitions and game shows; computer game and entertainment software for playing and participating in games of skill and card games, gaming contests, competitions and game shows; all of the foregoing excludes mobile platform application software, and product development software for developing mobile phone applicationsACTIVE—
028Playing cards; counters for games in the nature of counter discs; chips for gambling; games, namely, non-electric casino board games; parlor games; apparatus for games, namely, dice, cups for dice games, roulette wheels, poker sets consisting primarily of playing cards and poker chips, game tables; portable games with liquid crystal displays; amusement machines, automatic and coin-operated; gaming machines for gambling; slot machines in the nature of gaming machinesACTIVE—
035retail and online retail store services featuring games, toys and playing cardsACTIVE—
041Organization of entertainment competitions in the nature of games of skill, card games, poker and casino gaming contests and poker and casino gaming competitions, conducting live poker games, ongoing television game shows, games of chance to be played at a casino; providing online casino facilities for gambling; game services provided on-line from a computer network, namely, online casino gaming, on-line entertainment services in the nature of casino gaming and conducting on-line casino card game tournaments via the internet; entertainment services, on-line interactive multi-player casino gaming and conducting on-line interactive multi-player casino card game tournaments and competitions via the internet; gambling services; entertainment information servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2019FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jan 25, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 17, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 9, 2018GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance