USPTO serial 87769251
MEM ROBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEM ROBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RENE-MARTIN OLIVERAS
18 BROOKLAKE ROADFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote circuit breaker control switch operators; Remote control starters for vehicles; Remote control telemetering machines and apparatus; Remote control transmitter for radio-controlled devices; Remote controlled thermal imaging systems, not for medical use; Remote controls for LAND VEHICLES; Remote cursor controls for computers; Remote sensors for use in measuring thermal and infrared radiation energy waves; Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Automated self contained electronic surveillance devices that can be deployed to gather evidence or intelligence in remote locations; Building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station; Computer hardware and software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Computer hardware and software systems for LAND VEHICLES; Computer hardware for LAND VEHICLES; Control system for the remote observation, management and operation of cranes, comprising computers, software, electromechanical controls, and video display screens; Electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; Electric strikes for remote control of door ingress and egress; Electro-dynamic apparatus for the remote control of signals; Electronic apparatus for the remote control of industrial operations; Electronic instruments for use in remote inspection and measurement of industrial components using remote visual devices; Electronic key fobs being remote control apparatus; Electronic personal emergency response system consisting of a device worn on the body with a button that users push to notify others in the event of an emergency, and a remote unit that dials out on the telephone for help; Integrated battery backup systems comprising a battery, an electronic measurement apparatus for use in the measurement of battery health and performance, and a remote computer software program that uses the foregoing data to trend, predict, and store data related to the health of the battery; Mechanical remote controls for motors; Parts for anti-theft automotive alarms, namely, electronic sensors, remote control transmitters and receivers for remotely operating land vehicles; Radio transmitters and receivers for remote controls, radio controls; Sound systems comprising remote controls, amplifiers, loudspeakers and components therefor; Telecommunications hardware and software for monitoring and alerting remote sensor status via the Internet; Wireless remote temperature and humidity monitors for building maintenance; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, LAND VEHICLES; Wireless presenter in the nature of a wireless remote pointer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THOMAS
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, PAUL
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, JEANNE
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THERESA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MEM ROBOTICS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |