USPTO serial 87772117
UNIVERSAL SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERSAL SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda M. Prose
Amanda M. Prose WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction, repair, and restoration project management services, namely, fiber splicing in the nature of laying of cable, installation of OSP/ISP telecommunications wiring and hardware, directional drilling for underground utilities, surface restoration, namely, brushing, stamping, brooming, tamping of concrete surfaces, concrete surface doweling, concrete removal, concrete coring and removal, concrete pour back and finishing, asphalt removal, asphalt pour back, asphalt sidewalk placement, asphalt walking path replacement, asphalt cold patching, asphalt hot patching, asphalt milling; subgrade preparation in the nature of construction grading, vacuum excavation, site walkouts in the nature of inspection during the course of construction; all for private entities, commercial entities, municipalities, and utility companies; General construction, restoration and repair contracting services, namely, fiber splicing in the nature of laying cable, installation of OSP/ISP telecommunications wiring and hardware, directional drilling for underground utilities, surface restoration, namely, brushing, stamping, brooming, tamping of concrete surfaces, concrete surface doweling, concrete removal, concrete coring and removal, concrete pour back and finishing, asphalt removal, asphalt pour back, asphalt sidewalk placement, asphalt walking path replacement, asphalt cold patching, asphalt hot patching, asphalt milling; subgrade preparation, namely, construction grading services, removal of dirt, clay, sand, rock, concrete, blacktop, backfilling with clean dirt, sand, or base material for hydroseeding, straw and seed, seeding, concrete, blacktop, bricks or final hardscape surface, vacuum excavation, and site walkouts, for private entities, commercial entities, municipalities, and utility companies, namely, site walkouts for determining and planning scope of construction, restoration and repair services recited herein; Construction, restoration and repair services, namely, fiber splicing in the nature of laying cable, installation of OSP/ISP telecommunications wiring and hardware, directional drilling for underground utilities, surface restoration, namely, brushing, stamping, brooming, tamping of concrete surfaces, concrete surface doweling, concrete removal, concrete coring and removal, concrete pour back and finishing, asphalt removal, asphalt pour back, asphalt sidewalk placement, asphalt walking path replacement, asphalt cold patching, asphalt hot patching, asphalt milling; subgrade preparation, namely, construction excavation and grading, removal of dirt, clay, sand, rock, concrete, blacktop, backfilling with clean dirt, sand, or base material for hydroseeding, straw and seed, seeding, concrete, blacktop, bricks or final hardscape surface, vacuum excavation, site walkouts, for private entities, commercial entities, municipalities, and utility companies, namely, namely, site walkouts for determining and planning scope of construction, restoration and repair services recited herein | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |