USPTO serial 87772694
EPIALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2018
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with EPIALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
Novi, MI
Other trademarks owned by Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
Novi, MI
Other trademarks owned by Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
Commerce Charter Twp., MI
Other trademarks owned by Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preetha Chakrabarti
Preetha Chakrabarti CROWELL & MORING LLP375 Ninth AvenueTwo Manhattan WestNew York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Thermosetting molding compound, particularly fiber reinforced phenolic molding compositions for use in a wide variety of industries, such as for electrical devices and automotive engine parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named EPIALL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |