USPTO serial 87773023
TRAVEL ACCESS BENEFITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRAVEL ACCESS BENEFITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL ASSETS DEVELOPERS, S.A. DE C.V.
Cancún, Quintana Roo, MX
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL ASSETS DEVELOPERS, S.A. DE C.V.
INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL ASSETS DEVELOPERS, S.A. DE C.V.
Cancún, Quintana Roo, MX
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL ASSETS DEVELOPERS, S.A. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felipe Rubio
FELIPE RUBIO RUBIO & ASSOCIATES8950 SW 74TH CTSUITE 1804MIAMI, FL 33156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Organisation of travel; Organizing transport for travelers; Transport brokerage; Transport reservation; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; Travel booking agencies; Making reservations and bookings for transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL ASSETS DEVELOPERS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL ASSETS DEVELOPERS, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TRAVEL ACCESS BENEFITS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |