USPTO serial 87773709
TWINOBJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWINOBJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
28046 MADRID, ES
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software with a rule-based visual programming paradigm for processing, streaming, accessing, and analyzing transactional data, Software and computer software applications which process replicated data while utilizing the same physical memory space, software and computer application software for extraction and translation of business logic and data into reusable objects for diversified software environments | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2017 |
| 042 | Computer programming for allowing in-memory objects with a high number of concurrent transactions which involve business logic and data utilizing a single-process, mono thread, and/or standalone maintenance model that provides fault-tolerance, scale-up and out and hot updates | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |