Drawing for SKRITSWAP

USPTO serial 87774036

SKRITSWAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKRITSWAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine de Lint

Christine de Lint NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP200 Bay StreetRoyal Bank Plaza South Tower, Suite 3800Toronto, Ontario, M5J2Z4

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for analysing, translating, adapting, and customizing text to individual users' characteristics; computer software platform for the purpose of sharing text that has been customized to individual users' characteristicsACTIVE—
038Providing multiple user access to the Internet for the purpose of sharing text that has been customized to individual users' characteristicsACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for analysing, translating, adapting, and customizing text to individual users' characteristics and software platforms for sharing text that has been customized to individual users' characteristicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance