USPTO serial 87774508
ZOOX MOBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZOOX MOBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foster City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
RHETT V. BARNEY LEE & HAYES, PLLC601 WEST RIVERSIDE, SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for enabling mobility as a service; Computer application software for configuring robots to provide mobility and transportation services; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for electronic message alerts featuring leads, optimal matches, and matching posts for services, scheduling, namely, connecting transportation providers with individuals and groups needing rides, the arrangement and booking of transportation, electronic messages, social networking services and profiles; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehicles; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for connecting drivers and passengers; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for automated scheduling and dispatch of motor vehicles; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for coordinating transportation services; Mobile application software for engaging transportation services; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices, namely, software for remote control of electronic devices; Electronic devices in the nature of transportation control systems for unmanned transportation units; Electronic components for unmanned transportation units, namely, connectors and interconnectors for computers and computer hardware, computer network interface devices and computer interface boards, electronic display interfaces, and electronic communication systems, all for mobility robotics and comprised of computer hardware and software to enable signaling, switching and control of electronic components for aerial robotics and power management, data management, downlink transmission control, and interactions with other unmanned vehicles, all for mobility robotics and parts and fittings therefor; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Electronic vehicle tracking apparatus; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Instruments for detecting traffic | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles; Land vehicles and conveyances in the nature of automobiles; Self-driving transport vehicles; Unmanned conveying land vehicles; Passenger carrying vehicles, namely, land vehicles; Electric vehicles, namely, automobiles; Road vehicles; Driverless cars; Mobility conveyances namely, automated people movers; Mobility vehicles, namely, passenger shuttles; Industrial vehicles, namely, semi-trailer trucks; Passenger motor vehicles, namely, land vehicles; Unmanned vehicles, namely, land vehicles; Transportation robots, namely, robotic transport vehicles; drones; Structural parts for all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport of persons and goods; Transportation and delivery services by air, road, rail and sea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |