USPTO serial 87774523
ZOOX SOLBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, MICHAEL J.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZOOX SOLBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foster City, CA
Foster City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W Riverside Ave Ste 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for enabling mobility as a service, namely, for providing transportation services; Computer application software for configuring robots to provide mobility and transportation services; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for electronic message alerts featuring leads, optimal matches, and matching posts for services, scheduling, namely, connecting transportation providers with individuals and groups needing rides, the arrangement and booking of transportation, managing the sending and receiving of electronic messages, and managing and maintaining social networking services and profiles; Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehicles; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for connecting drivers and passengers; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for automated scheduling and dispatch of motor vehicles; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for coordinating transportation services; Mobile application software for engaging transportation services; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld devices, namely, software for remote control of electronic devices; Electronic devices in the nature of transportation control systems, namely, hardware controllers for unmanned transportation units in the nature of automobiles, robotic transport vehicles, self-driving transport vehicles; Electronic components for unmanned transportation units, namely, connectors and interconnectors for computers and computer hardware, computer network interface devices and computer interface boards, electronic display interfaces, and electronic communication systems, all for mobility robotics and comprised of computer hardware and software to enable signaling, switching and control of electronic components for aerial robotics and power management, data management, downlink transmission control, and interactions with other unmanned vehicles, all for mobility robotics and parts and fittings therefor; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Electronic vehicle tracking apparatus; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Instruments for detecting traffic, namely, electronic sensors | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport of persons and goods; Transportation and delivery services by air, road, rail and sea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |