USPTO serial 87775819
ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Therese B. Varndell
THERESE B. VARNDELL POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC12040 SOUTH LAKES DRIVE, SUITE 101RESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of engineering infrastructure and engineering-related fair and objective standard contract documents between all parties involved in contract documents for engineering design and construction projects | ACTIVE | Dec 19, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 22, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |