USPTO serial 87777695
VIRTUAL FLUID MONITORING SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL FLUID MONITORING SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason P. Mueller
Jason P. Mueller FISHERBROYLES LLP14781 Memorial Drive #207Houston, TX 77079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatuses for evaluating fluid condition by determining temperature, viscosity, oxidation, wear metal content, acid content, base content, sample fuel-dilution, general sample dilution, and soot levels; Measuring and calibrating instruments, namely, spectroscopy-based systems for taking measurements used to determine fluid conditions based on optical spectral analysis, namely, RAMAN spectrometry systems comprised of optical probes, optical sensors, LASER transmitters, and microprocessor-based measurement units; Temperature and viscosity detection systems, namely, thermometers, thermocouple probes and viscometers; Computer software for providing communication with computerized global and/or mobile networks; Computer software for controlling fluid condition analysis hardware; Computer software for scheduling sample collection and communicating reports and alerts to end users; Electromechanical devices for evaluating fluid condition by determining at least one physical condition, namely, temperature, viscosity, oxidation, wear metal content, general sample dilution, fuel-dilution, acid content, base content, and soot levels; Electromechanical devices, namely, spectroscopy-based systems, used to determine fluid conditions based on optical spectral analysis, namely, fluorescent, infrared, near infrared, and RAMAN spectrometry systems comprised of optical probes, optical sensors, LASER electromagnetic radiation transmitters for excitation of fluid samples, and microprocessor-based measurement detection units for measuring emission of electromagnetic radiation emission from fluid samples following excitation; Electromechanical temperature and viscosity detection systems, namely, thermometers and viscometers, thermocouple probes and viscometers; Computer software for analysis of fluid condition data collected by electromechanical devices measuring one or more fluid conditions; Computer hardware for providing for communication with computerized global and/or mobile networks for collecting and transmitting data related to one or more fluid conditions and reporting fluid condition to an end user | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, and repair of electromechanical apparatuses and their parts and accessories, namely, spectroscopy-based systems for taking measurements used to determine fluid conditions based on optical spectral analysis, for evaluating fluid conditions by determining of at least one physical parameter, namely, temperature, viscosity, oxidation, wear metal content, acid content, base content, sample fuel-dilution, general sample dilution, or soot levels; Condition-based maintenance of equipment used for evaluating fluid condition by determining at least one physical parameter, namely, temperature, viscosity, oxidation, wear metal content, acid content, base content, sample fuel-dilution, general sample dilution, or soot levels | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Condition monitoring of fluid conditions and analysis of fluid conditions, for the purpose of delivering reports, alerts, and recommendations including predictive maintenance, all related to the evaluation of fluid conditions comprising the determination of at least one physical parameter, namely, temperature, viscosity, oxidation, wear metal content, acid content, base content, sample fuel-dilution, general sample dilution, or soot levels; Technical consultancy in the field of monitoring and analysis of fluid conditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |