USPTO serial 87777994
DEVICESTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEVICESTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1835 MARKET STREET, SUITE 1050PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for device connectivity; cloud computing featuring software for secure connectivity; cloud computing featuring software for remote device software updates; cloud computing featuring software for centralized support; cloud computing featuring software for usage tracking; cloud computing featuring software for data access, data collection, data integration, data management, data visualization, and data analytics; cloud computing featuring data-breach and cyber security software; cloud computing feature software for protecting connected devices from cyber-attacks; cloud computing featuring software for updates to remote devices in real time; cloud computing featuring software for responding to data breaches, cyber threats and attacks; cloud computing for software disaster recovery support; cloud computing featuring software for active logging, monitoring and tracing; software support services; notification and delivery of software updates; software customization services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |