USPTO serial 87778778
X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hoodies; headwear, namely, baseball caps, visors being headwear, toques, bandanas | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Meat, cheese, pepperoni, edible oils, processed vegetables, processed fruit; instant and precooked soup, garden salads, chicken wings | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) pizzas; calzones; bread sticks; pasta; prepared pasta; flatbreads; sandwiches; spices; sauces; bakery desserts; cookies; pastries; coffee based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) non-alcoholic water based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Wholesale and retail store services featuring food products; franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) food delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Restaurant services; pizza parlours; takeout restaurant services; providing food and beverages for catering and events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Halsted Pizza Marks Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named X
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |