USPTO serial 87778894
HIGH ROLLER GRAND SLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH ROLLER GRAND SLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALENA HERRANEN
ALENA HERRANEN LAW OFFICE OF ALENA HERRANEN4365 SAMOSET AVENUESAN DIEGO, CA 92117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of television programs in relation to poker or poker tournaments; Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about poker and poker tournaments accessible by means of television, cable television, satellite television, Internet, video on demand, web-based applications, social media, mobile phone applications, and computer networks; Entertainment in the nature of poker tournaments; Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring poker and poker tournaments provided through television, cable television, satellite television, Internet, video on demand, web-based applications, social media, mobile phone applications, and computer networks; Entertainment services, namely, conducting live poker games; Organizing, conducting and operating poker tournaments; Providing instructional information on poker | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 25, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |