USPTO serial 87782230
EPC ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE COMPUTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPC ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE COMPUTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saratoga, CA
Saratoga, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for accessing and navigating computer networks; downloadable software for accessing, viewing, sharing, creating, managing, modifying, replicating, updating, using, linking, and virtualizing data over computer networks; downloadable application programming interface (API) software for executing software and running code; computer software for development, deployment, and execution of computer systems, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs); computer software for deploying computer software of others; computer software for automating and virtualizing data center equipment and operations; computer software for controlling and automating large groups of servers, switches, storage, and routers to create on-demand computer storage clouds and compute services with network services built-in (IaaS); downloadable software in the nature of open source computing software for development, deployment, and execution of scalable computer services on container hosting platforms, graphics processing units (GPUs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGs), and neural network processors; downloadable software development tools for development, deployment, and execution of Function as a Service (FAAS) services on container hosting platforms, graphics processing units (GPUs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and neural network processors; downloadable software for design and development of software applications; downloadable software for running web applications; computer application software, namely, software for use in data storage and data management; computer software for use in connecting computer networks and systems, servers, and storage devices; computer hardware for storing digital data; computer hardware for monitoring computer storage devices; computer software for storing digital data; external computer hard drives featuring software for electronic storage of data; computer data storage systems comprising computer hardware; computer data storage systems comprising computer memory hardware, modules, and devices, and data servers, namely, network servers, internet servers, and computer servers, database management software, communication software for providing access to the Internet and for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems, and providing accelerated data transfer access, computer circuit boards; high capacity data storage systems comprising blank electronic storage media; high capacity data storage systems comprising computer hardware and computer software to manage and operate high capacity data storage systems; data storage appliances, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; storage servers namely, computer storage servers, digital media storage servers, video storage servers; blank computer storage devices, namely, flash drives (SSD), hard drives (HDD) and optical disks; operating system software; storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; computer software using a consensus engine incorporating blockchain technology for securing data with cryptographic information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |