USPTO serial 87782517
POKOPANG WONDERLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OEHRLEIN, STEFAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POKOPANG WONDERLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Haeundae-gu, Busan, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boris Umansky
BORIS UMANSKY LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE #1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Gaming services in the nature of casino gaming, providing a computer game for use network-wide by network users; Provision of on-line non-downloadable games software by means of a computer based systems; Providing online non-downloadable mobile game software; Mobile game services, namely, providing online mobile computer games; Providing online mobile computer games via a computer network; Providing of online electronic games; Provision of entertainment information relating to game character; Entertainment services, namely, providing online nondownloadable image and audio recordings featuring computer game images and voices for entertainment purposes; Providing of game contents via online, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable image and video recordings featuring computer game character images and videos of computer game characters for entertainment purposes; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Arranging and conducting of computer game playing events for entertainment purposes; Planning, organizing, and arranging of online electronic game competitions and other electronic game competitions; Providing online computer games; Provision of online game entertainment information; Providing of online electronic publications, not downloadable, via mobile device, namely, newsletters about electronic games; Providing online electronic publications, not downloadable, namely, newsletters about electronic games; Production and distribution of animation TV series; Entertainment services in the nature of development of multimedia entertainment content for games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |