USPTO serial 87783529
POLKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLEINMAN, CORINNE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Computer software, namely, downloadable computer software for word processing, computer software for document and database management, for application and database integration, for producing financial models, for use as a spreadsheet, for authorizing access to databases, for creating searchable databases of information and data, for use in customer relationship management (CRM), to automate data warehousing, and for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information, software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Communications software for connecting computer network users, global computer networks, computer software for controlling self-service terminals, for administration of computer networks, for wireless content delivery, for administration of computer local area networks, for use in computer access control, for controlling and managing access server applications, for controlling and managing access server applications, for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems, to maintain and operate computer system, for providing access to the Internet; Computer software, namely, computer software for encryption, computer software development tools, computer operating software, computer graphics software, computer game software, computer anti-virus software, computer software for the creation of firewalls, computer software and firmware for operating system programs, computer aided design (CAD) software for general use, computer aided manufacturing (CAM) software for general use; computer peripherals; electronic data processing apparatus; computer networking and data communications equipment, namely, computer networking hardware, electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware for the transmission of data between two points, computer network adapters, switches, routers, and hubs; Computer components and parts, namely, electronic components for computers; electronic computer memory devices; electronic control apparatus in the nature of electrical controlling devices and computer keyboard controllers; programmed-data-carrying electronic circuits; video films, namely, video recordings featuring art, music and artistic performances, entertainment, fashion, sports, culture, general human interest, film production, languages, science and technology, law; electric wires for communication; electrodes; telephones; aerials; batteries; micro processors; keyboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 14, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |