USPTO serial 87786918
VERITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bridgewater, NJ
Bridgewater, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Detweiler
SEAN D DETWEILER MORSE BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON PC230 THIRD AVENUE4TH FLOOR CITYPOINTWALTHAM, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software configured for insulin monitoring and tracking blood glucose levels; Downloadable software configured for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, sharing and analysis of data and information in the field of diabetes management | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, diabetes management devices, infusion pumps, infusion pump controllers and parts and attachments thereof; Medical devices and sensors used to continuously monitor the concentration of glucose in the human body; Glucose monitors; Glucose monitor accessories, namely, transmitters, receivers, and medical sensor insertion devices; Wearable medical devices for insulin monitoring | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |