USPTO serial 87794115
ZIP LOOKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIP LOOKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hauppauge, NY
Saint James, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua Frick
Joshua Frick BARNES & THORNBURG LLPP.O. BOX 2786Chicago, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair dye; hair relaxers; hair lighteners; hair texturizers; hair frosts; hair wax; hair colorants; hair sprays; hair lotion; hair bleach; hair tonics; hair oils; hair nourishers; hair lacquers; hair gels; hair fixers; hair decolorants; hair balsam; hair masks; hair mascara; hair mousse; hair shampoo; hair rinses; hair conditioners; hair glaze; hair emollients; hair color; hair butter; hair pomades; hair glitter; hair piece bonding glue; hair-washing powder; oils for hair conditioning; styling foam for hair; hair detangling preparations; adhesives for affixing false hair; cosmetic hair regrowth inhibiting preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated hair serums; medicated hair care preparations; hair growth stimulants | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Electric hair straightener; electric hair crimper; electric hair trimmers; electric hair clippers; hair cutting scissors; non-electric hair clippers; hair-removing tweezers; hand-operated hair clippers; electric hair curling irons; electrolysis apparatus for hair removal; bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair cutting scissors and shears; blades for electric razors; depilation appliances, electric and non- electric; curling tongs; crimping irons; flat irons | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hairdressing appliances, namely, hair dryers and hair dryer diffusers; hair drying machines for beauty salon use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes; hair picks; hair combs; hot hair brushes; electrically heated hair brushes; hair tinting bowls; hair color application bottles; caddies for holding hair accessories for household and domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair weaves; hair elastics; hair netting; hair ribbons; hair grips; false hair; hair slides; hair rods; hair clamps; hair chopsticks; hair extensions; hair pieces; hair buckles; hair bows; hair pins; hair nets; hair bands; hair clips; hair barrettes; hair scrunchies; hair frosting caps; hair coloring caps; hair coloring foils; non-electric hair rollers; clam clips for hair; toupees; hair curl clips; hair curl papers; synthetic braiding hair; human braiding hair; electric hair waving implements; foam hair rollers; hair pieces and wigs; hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; waving pins for the hair; cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair extensions and hair pieces; bridal headpieces in the nature of ornamental hair combs; wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair; braids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zip Loxx, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Zip Loxx, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named ZIP LOOKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |