Drawing for TEMPO CONNECT

USPTO serial 87794744

TEMPO CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEMPO CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine A. Rittenhouse

JEANNINE A. RITTENHOUSE IPHORGAN LTD.195 NORTH ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROADSUITE 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mobile information systems for providing entertainment, fleet control and course control as a feature of connected golf carts, namely, software and units comprised of speakers, touchscreens and displays installed in golf carts for managing and controlling a golf cart fleet, control and monitoring of golf cart condition, operation and maintenance of a golf cart fleet, arranging for golf cart assignments and reservations, providing GPS, monitoring and managing golf cart location, monitoring and managing golf cart power consumption, geo fencing and control of golf cart speed and location, scorekeeping, messaging, remote shut down, and for providing entertainment, music and golf-related content, communication, and providing purchasing capability between the golf cart user and clubhouseACTIVE—
012Motorized golf carts, computerized golf carts, and off-road utility vehicles used for property maintenance, for transportation of people and goods, and for entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance